Three Is Much More Than Two

noname-e1379087024494

So in a moment of weakness, my wife Ellen and I agreed to move into my elder daughter (Annie) and son-in-law’s (Danny) house a couple of weekends ago to take care of the three kids for 24 hours. Annie was surprising Danny for his upcoming 40th birthday with a night ‘on the town’ in DC with their friends.

Promises have a way of coming due, and so we kept our word.

As you can see from the picture above, the kids are getting to be a handful. But we all survived, and I don’t even have my usual list of ‘disasters’ to write about.

But I did get to thinking about the differences between one child, two, and three.

I’ve always felt that two kids were not just one more than one kid. And that three kids simply multiplies the possibilities  – joys, opportunities, challenges, etc…

For example, with just one kid, there are only four possible combinations (groupings) that have to learn to get along: Annie + Danny + Eli (1); Annie + Danny vs Eli (2); Annie + Eli vs Danny (3); and Danny + Eli vs Annie (4).

When you add another child, Abby, for example, the combinations, groupings jump to 8.

When you add a third child, Ryan, for example, the combinations jump to 16.

(Not being sure of my math skills, I checked with my numbers’ cruncher (btilis) whose first response was a request for more information (could there only be two separate groups or could there also be a group of all individuals). Then he responded, “I really don’t know.  I tried writing them out and can’t come up with a pattern (my brain is fried).  The multiple teams really throws things off for me.”

(So I tried to simplify it for him (and he’s the numbers guy, not me), saying just groups, no individuals. His response, I’ll spare you the details, matched mine from above if you also allow for one grouping of all the individuals.)

Bottom line: the difference in the combinations of groups jumps from 4 to 8 to 16, which are multiples, confirming my instinct that having two or three kids is not like adding one or two more. Its a geometric increase, not an arithmetic one.

But then any of you who have more than one kid certainly doesn’t need this posting to confirm that.

Pictures probably say it better:

1. With one child, there are only four possible groups (groupings) that have to learn to get along:

DSC_2830

2. With two children, that jumps to eight:

P1050380

3. With three, the combinations double to 16:

_DSC0137

A Guilty Pleasure

Tags

, , ,

17237152

Perhaps I should change that to “Another Guilty Pleasure.”

Those of you who open my emails touting my latest nonsense on MillersTime know of my acknowledged addiction to the Boston Red Sox, even if you, wisely, avoid reading what I write about them.

There is a second addiction, which some of you may have discerned and I am willing to acknowledge here, and that is to Lee Child’s thrillers featuring his, and many of his readers’ obsession with, his hero Jack Reacher.

(This addiction, for which I blame and thank Elliott Trommald, is not as debilitating as the one to the Sox as Child has ‘only’ written 18 books while the Sox play 162 games every year. Plus, it only takes a few hours to read a Child’s book, and you’re pretty well assured of the outcome of his latest thriller even before you begin to read it. Not so with the Sox.)

All of the above is an introduction to Lee Child’s latest book, Never Go Back, and my attendance at a Lee Child’s book talk last night in DC.

First, the book:

It’s good.

The first 40 or 50 pages (it’s hard to tell about pages when reading electronically) are as good as Child’s best. Never Go Back opens with Reacher, in fact, going back to Washington, DC, where he’s spent a good deal of his ‘professional’ career and where he immediately gets himself thrown into jail.

The middle of the book slows a bit, and I found the ending (it’s not a spoiler to say Reacher wins again) a bit anti-climatic, tho there is some question about what will happen between Reacher and his female counterpart.

Is it Child’s best?

I don’t know.

In fact, that is both the good and bad about Child’s writing. It’s absorbing and a wonderful diversion to whatever else is going on in the reader’s life. And then it’s over, and I, for one, cannot remember or separate many of his earlier books from each other.

Someone said Child’s books are ‘candy for the brain.’ That sounds about right. Tho I’d add that they’re pretty high quality candy. And somewhat addictive too.

Since this is my year of ‘rereading,’ I think I might go back and reread at least one or two of his earlier ones to try to determine if there’s more to Child’s writing than admiring Jack Reacher and marveling at his ability to get himself into and out of messes and ‘Robin Hooding’ and ‘revenging’ his way around the country. (Any suggestions for my rereads from those of you who are Child/Reacher fans?)

Lee Child in person:

Lee_Child_2

I’m not sure what I expected of this evening, other than hoping (against hope) that I would see Jack Reacher himself.

But despite not meeting Reacher, the evening was more enjoyable and more informative than most of the book talks I’ve attended.

First of all, as I’ve written elsewhere, he’s not Lee Child. That’s just the pen name British writer Jim Grant uses, tho I still haven’t learned why he needs an alias. And there was no reference to the name Grant at his appearance last night.  Not sure what that’s all about.

Child did tell last night’s audience his naming of his main character Jack Reacher came from a comment from his wife, who said if his writing career did not work out, he could always become a ‘can reacher’ at the local supermarket because he was so tall.  After working for 18 years in television, he had been fired in a ‘corporate restructuring.’ Out of a job at the age of 39, he decided to try his hand at writing, since, he said, “I’d read obsessively all my life, starting at the age of three, and I didn’t know what else to do.”

Now, 18 books later, one a year since his first one in 1997, Child says, “This is a great life, a great job, and I meet nice people. Plus, now that I’ve spent as much time writing as I did in television, I think I may never have to get another job.” He said he “had no work ethic, being a European” (tho he now lives in NYC) and thoroughly “loves the craft, art, and creativity of writing, even if sometimes I have to write as much as four or five hours a day.” He claimed he does no research, at least in the traditional sense, tho he stores experiences and observations which he uses in his writing and sees his whole life as research.

Asked how he came to his Jack Reacher character, Child said, “Being out of work and being unemployable, I knew I had to make this book work. I closed my eyes and wrote, and Reacher is what came out. He’s an amalgamation, inspired by things I’ve read (John D. MacDonald, for example). There’s a long tradition of loners in literature, individuals who are talented in a narrow range of things, idiots otherwise.”

Asked about the violence of Reacher, Child said, “Violence is how I feel. Everyone has a list of people you’d cheerfully shoot in the head but can’t. Reacher does it. It satisfies a primeval urge. You can do it in fiction, sort of a way to work out frustrations.”

For those of you who have not read any of Child’s books, know that even though his main character appears in all of them, each of his books stands alone, and you do not have to read them in any order.

For those of you who may be wondering how long Child/Grant will continue writing, he told the audience that at one point he thought he might stop with this book, Never Go Back. But in fact he recently signed a contract for another three books, and on September 1 (“I always start a new book on Sept. 1,” he said.) he began his 19th Jack Reacher book, which he’s tentatively titled 20 Seconds Ago.

Lee Child may not be Jack Reacher, but clearly he admires him, has some physical similarities to his ‘hero’ and from listening to Child talk, clearly he’s put some of himself into this character (his sense of time, his sense of humor, his feelings about violence, his view of the world, for starters). And Child/Grant is as every bit as likeable as is Reacher.

A good evening and a good introduction to the man who has been responsible for many hours of this ‘guilty pleasure’.

Three New Films to Consider

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Closed Circuit *** 1/2

closed_circuit64

Of the three films mini-reviewed here, Closed Circuit is the least memorable and just makes it into the category where I post a mini-review (above three stars).

Nevertheless, as the film ended, I was wishing to myself that the film had continued for another half hour or so, at least. I was involved in this British crime thriller throughout its 1 hour & 36 minutes, and I enjoyed the story, the characters, and the acting.

Perhaps some of my interest came from the current concerns of our NSA’s infiltration our daily communications, or at least their ability to do so. Not that this film addressed the specific issues that are so troublesome about what the NSA is doing, but it comes close and does focus on the role of government crossing boundaries as it attempts to stem terrorism.

However, despite its ability to keep the viewer totally engaged, it was not memorable in the way that some of the best ‘whodunit/what happens’ films are (whether that has to do with my increasingly short term memory challenges or the film itself, I’m not sure).

So, if you’re looking for a thriller film that will keep you entertained, if only briefly, check it out.

 

Short Term 12 *****

Short-Term-12-poster

Definitely one of the best I’ve seen so far this year.

I admit I was primed to enjoy the film (tho also perhaps to be critical of it) as it has much to do with how I’ve spent my professional life, working with unhappy, hurt, angry, and emotionally troubled adolescents and also my close involvement with the staff charged with the care and treatment of these young people and their families.

The setting of the film takes place in a short term (supposedly 12 months) residential facility for adolescents who have all been in foster homes and who have been scarred and for various reasons have nowhere else to go at this point in their lives.

The portrayal of these troubled adolescents is as good as I’ve seen in any film. The three or four individuals that director Destin Daniel Cretton features are presented so realistically that I recognized each of them and kept saying to myself, “that’s exactly the way it is.”

But the film goes further as it also focuses on the interactions of the young, ‘front line’ staff (mostly in their 20s) with these adolescents. Grace (wonderfully played by Brie Larson) is the young supervisor of the residence, and the film is also about her struggle with issues from her own past as well as her relationship with a coworker, Mason (John Gallagher, Jr.).

Writer and director Cretton based the film on experiences and observations he had working in a similar institution earlier in his life. And he gets it all right. He also gets wonderful performances from a remarkably strong, young cast.

Leaving the film, I wondered if my ‘enjoyment’ and judgment about Short Term 12 was perhaps skewed by my own experiences in a somewhat similar situation (a day school tho, not a residential setting).

My wife Ellen, who has spent her professional life in or near the political world, was as enthusiastic as I was about the film and also remarked that it was as good a film as she’s seen so far this year.

 

Museum Hours ****

MV5BMjAzMzI3NDQ1NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTA0MjQ3OQ@@._V1_SX214_

Museum Hours is the opposite of Closed Circuit, that is if two films can be opposites.

Almost nothing happens in Museum Hours. The ‘plot’ involves two people, a guard (Johann) at the Kunsthistorisches Art Museum in Vienna and a Canadian visitor (Anne) who spends time at the museum when she’s not sitting by the bedside of a distant cousin who is in a coma at a Vienna hospital.

Actually, it’s probably not totally fair or accurate to say nothing happens. The two people meet, talk, and explore the museum and Vienna. At the end, the cousin dies and the woman leaves Vienna.

I went to see Museum Hours knowing I don’t like museums, and I certainly don’t like spending time in hospitals. Because the reviews were so positive, I put my dislikes aside, convincing myself that at least I might get to know a bit about Vienna, a city where I’ve never been.

Of course, I was surprised by what I saw. The exploration of Vienna, much of it non tourist Vienna, didn’t particularly entice me. But I found myself more interested in the museum than I ever expected to be, particularly seeing it through Johann’s eyes, then Anne’s, and also through the lens of Jem Cohen, the writer/director. Cohen brings the art to life as he mixes the paintings with current life issues.

Museum Hours is indeed a film primarily about art and the meaning it may have for our lives. To a lesser degree, it is also a film about friendship, but that is mostly a vehicle for Cohen to explore the Kunsthistorisches Art Museum and Vienna.

Slow at times (I admit to nodding off twice as I saw it shortly after lunch one day), it is a lovely film, with wonderful photography and an endearing performance by Bobby Sommer (his first film) as Johann.

Why You Gotta Stay ‘Til the End

Tags

, , , , , ,

Screen Shot 2013-09-06 at 9.14.07 AM

Last night proved once again that you simply have to stay until the end of a baseball game, whether that’s the 27th out or the final out or run scored in extra innings.

So after blowing a 7-2 lead to the Evil Empire last night, the mighty Sox were down to their final strike in the ninth inning. Mariano Rivera, the great God of closers, was on the mound. Mike Napoli, the strike out leader for the Sox with 171 so far this season, was up with two strikes. The Yunkee fans were all on their feet screaming for the final punch out, an amazing comeback, and an important win as their long season was hanging by a thread.

And I had my hand on the off button on my iPad so I wouldn’t have to see the Bronx celebration.

If you’re reading this post, you probably already know the outcome. Napoli scratches out a hit. Recent Sox acquiree and speedster Quintin Barry replaces Napoli on first, steals second and gets to third on a bad throw and a missed stop by hobbled Derek Jeter. Stephen Drew, unsung Sox player who was 0-4 already, scratches out a single, and the Sox tie the game. Rivera blows (another) save opportunity against my heroes.

So if you had left the stadium, as perhaps half of the Bronx fans had already done, or switched off your TV, iPad, or radio, you missed the come back.

Then it was another 15 minutes or so before the Yankees further imploded with Soriano getting greedy trying to steal third after having swiped second. He was caught. The Sox got out of the inning with the next batter.

In the 10th, after a blown call by an umpire on whether Shane Victorino had swung or not, benefiit to the Sox, chubby Joba Chamberlain gave up a go ahead RBI to one of this year’s key Sox players (Victorino).

Koji Uehara, the not so surprising Sox closer (to those who have followed his career closely), and perhaps the new, next God of closers, shut down the Yunks in the bottom of the 10th.

Four hours and thirty-two minutes.

And if you hadn’t stayed through the end of the 9th and on to the 10th, you woulda missed it.

There were enough mistakes by both teams, their managers, and the umpires to fill another post, but I’ll spare you that.

Suffice it to say, Thursday night’s game was simply another confirmation that no matter what, you have to stay until the end.

(PS – Elsewhere I’ve written why you also have to be at the park for the first inning, as the three hardest outs are not at the end of a game but in the first inning, when most runs are scored, before the pitchers settle in and while the offensive teams have their best hitters lined up).

The End of Sam Wo’s?

Tags

,

Pix by Anita Rechler

I regret to inform MillersTime readers that there will be no reopening of Sam Wo’s at 813 Washington St. in SF’s Chinatown.

Closed for health and building code violations in April 2012, negotiations have broken down between the owners of the building and the owners of Sam Wo’s over the cost ($300,000) to satisfy the necessary repairs. As a result, Julie Ho announced on her Facebook page that the 100+ year’s of Sam Wo’s rental of 813 Washington St. has come to an end. The restaurant will not reopen at that site.

It is possible, however, that the restaurant could reopen at a different location in SF’s Chinatown, tho that is not at all certain.  Julie Ho is apparently searching for a new location in the same neighborhood.

But for those of you, us, who have known this narrow, this three story ‘hole in the wall’ (?) where ‘diners’ entered through the kitchen and climbed to the second or third floor for inexpensive and satisfying Chinese food, it’s all over. No more food delivered on a rope pulled dumbwaiter. No more insults from the world’s rudest waiter (actually, he’s been gone a long time). No more two AM comfort food.

(To read more about Sam Wo’s, it’s history, the people who owned it, worked there, ate there, the attempts to keep it open, etc., check out this four minute YouTube video.)

 

Worst MillersTime Baseball Predictions – Please Vote

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Bryce Harper goes nuts.Harper’s age-19 season was arguably the best ever for a player of his age. It wasn’t just his physical tools, but his approach at the plate, with a good walk rate and acceptable strikeout-to-walk ratio, the way he worked to improve in the outfield, and his unmatched aggression on the bases. Mike Trout set the bar high for 20-year-olds last year; look for Harper to clear it and set a new standard for baseball playing by a guy who can’t legally buy a drink. He will challenge for the NL MVP for a Nationals team that might be the best in the game.

 –  Joe Sheenan, Sports IllustratedMy Baseball Predictions for 2013. Posted: Thu December 27, 2012 11:29AM; Updated: Thu January 3, 2013 3:39PM. (Ed. note: Harper is currently hitting .278 {last year he hit .270} with 19 HRs and an OBP/SLG/OPS of .381/.541/.895 {last year – .340/.477/817} and has missed more than a month because he continues to run into outfield walls. Harper is hardly equal or above Trout’s last year’s BA of .326, 30 HRs, and OBP/SLG/OPS of .399/.564/.963. Also, the Nats are barely above .500 and likely won’t make the playoffs. Clearly not “the best in game.”)

*                         *                          *                          *
I’ve gone through the 2013 MillersTime Baseball Contests looking to see which of you will turn out to be the wise (lucky) ones. In the process, I noticed there were a number of predictions that are a bit wide of the mark, so to speak.

 

So, while we await the outcome of the September games, I thought I’d ask all of you to vote for which of the following you judge to be The Worst Prediction for 2013:

 

  • 1. Teddy will win at least 26 races; Taft will not win any races. (Ed. note: You probably need to be a Nats’ Homer to understand this one. Anyway, Teddy has only won 8 times and Taft has already won 9 times.)
  • 2.  Nats win 103 games and the WS – multiple ‘fans’ mistakenly predicted a Nats’ WS win. (Ed’s note: Nats’ record currently at 69-68. Even were they to win all of their remaining games, their record would only be 94-68. If they continue at their current .504 rate, they will end up 82-82.)
  • 3. Blue Jays win AL East. (Ed.’s note: Blue Jays currently at 63-75, 18.5 games behind in the AL East.)
  • 4. Yankees win 95 games and “have little trouble in dispatching with the flotsam of Boston & Baltimore.” (Ed.’s note: Yunkees currently at 73-64 and would need to win 22 of their remaining 25 games to win 95.)
  • 5. Cole Hamels wins 24 games and leads the resurgent…Phillies to the NE East title. (Ed.’s note: Hamels is currently 6-13.)
  • 6. Stephen Strasburg wins 30 games. (Ed.’s note: Strasburg is currently 6-9.)
  • 7. The New York Yankees will finish 90-72, make playoffs, lose in the ALCS. (Ed.’s note: See # 4 above, plus the Yunkees are currently 8 games out of first, behind the Sox, Rays, & Os, and behind the As, Rangers, Rays, and Os for one of the two wild card spots.)
  • 8. The dreaded Yankees will win the WS. Jeter or Rivera will win MVP honors. (Ed.’s note: See above # 4, 7.)
  • 9.  Farrell will quickly realize the Sox need more depth in their rotation and will call his buddy Tito in Cleveland and put together a deal to get Dice-K back in Boston. (Ed’s note: Sox pitchers are currently first in the AL East with an ERA of 3.76 and fourth in the AL. Who is Dice-K ? That guy now pitching for the Mets who is 0-3?)
  • 10.  Baltimore will play Washington in the World Series. (Ed.’s note: See #2, etc.)
  • 11.  Jeter PEDs. (Ed.’s note: If he is, he isn’t getting any benefit as he’s currently hitting .196.)
  • 12.  Harper will hit well over .300 and hit at least 40 home runs. (Ed.’s note: See above,: re Joe Sheenan’s prediction, etc.)
  • 13.  Dodgers finish third with 80-85 wins. Ed.’s note: Dem Bums in first place by 12.5 games and in line to win about 97 games at their current rate of .599.)
  • 14.  Papi with 15 quick HRs. career ending injury. (Ed.’s note: Otiz currently has 24 HRs and a BA of .312. No sign as of this writing of a career ending injury.)
  • 15.  Derek Jeter revives his bat and gets at least 250 hits and bats over .300 for the season. (Ed.’s note: See #11. And he currently has nine {9} hits.)

You can vote once, you can get friends to vote, you can vote for your own predictions, and you need to get your votes in by September 30 (tho I’d prefer you do it sooner). You can put your vote in the Comment section on this post or send it to me by email (Samesty84@gmail.com)

Whoever’s the winner (i.e., the author of”The Worst Prediction for 2013) will have the ‘honor’/’dishonor’ of attending a Nats’ game with me next season.

Lee Child / Jack Reacher Fans, Join Me…

Tags

, , ,

30BOOK-articleInline

Lee Child – Jack Reacher

If you know the name Jack Reacher and have read lots (any) of Lee Child’s books, then you might want to join me Tuesday, September 10  at 7 PM in DC to see and hear Child’s talk about his newest book, Never Go Back.

Janet Maslin’s review in the NY Times (Aug. 29) of this recent book opens with the following:

Lee Child’s bodacious action hero, Jack Reacher, has already tramped through 17 novels and three e-book singles. But his latest, “Never Go Back,” may be the best desert island reading in the series. It’s exceptionally well plotted. And full of wild surprises. And wise about Reacher’s peculiar nature. And positively Bunyanesque in its admiring contributions to Reacher lore.

For those of you who haven’t had the good fortune to read any of Child’s thrillers, he’s a British writer named Jim Grant (Lee Child is his pen name). His 17+ books featuring the ‘detective’ Jack Reacher are some of the best escapist books I know. Grant/Child’s books have won numerous awards, beginning with his first one, Killing Floor, which won a best first novel award in 1997, and on to his 2012 A Wanted Man which won a National Book Award for Thriller/Crime Novel of the Year.

To ‘claim’ the one free ticket I have, send me an email (Samesty84@gmail.com) if you want to/can join me.

Lagniappe

Tags

, , , , ,

Lagniappe: n. Chiefly Southern Louisiana & Mississippi

         1. A small gift presented by a store owner to a customer with the customer’s purchase.

         2. An extra or unexpected gift or benefit.

I’ve just returned from a week on the ‘left’ coast, where everyone is younger, smarter, more beautiful, more athletic, and more hip (do people still use that word?) than those of us back east. I went to visit some friends and to cheer on my Red Sox in their games against the Giants and the Dodgers (my heroes did well for those of you who do not follow such important events).

But this post is not about baseball. It’s about an unexpected, and delightful, discovery.

Since I had a few days between games in SF and LA, I went to Portland to visit a friend and to observe the Thirsters, a group that has been meeting (almost) every Thursday of the year for the past 10 years to talk about whatever interests them. I had wondered about the possibility of getting such a group underway in DC.

It was in Portland that I received a lagniappe, an unexpected gift, a benefit: an afternoon at Lan Su Yuan, The Portland Classical Chinese Garden.

More than 25 years ago, on the first of several trips to China, I fell in love with the gardens of Suzhou and classical Chinese gardens. Tho I’ve never been particularly interested in plants, flowers, and the like, there was something about these gardens that fascinated me. So much so, that for the past 25 years I’ve thought about importing some aspects of these classical gardens to the two outdoor spaces at our home in DC.

When we recently redid our kitchen, I took the opportunity to create here something along the lines of what I found so pleasing about the gardens of Suzhou. With the work of a wonderful landscape gardener, Tom Virnston, and the help of my wife and several friends, we are nearing completion of our very own two Chinese-like gardens, The Fragrant Reader’s Garden and The Humble Blogger’s Garden. (In another post, at another time, I will write about what we have created and have Ellen take some pictures of it.)

But back to Portland and last week.

I had forgotten that in Portland, OR there was what is probably the most authentic  example of a classical Chinese garden that exists anywhere outside of China.  Portland, as a result of being a sister city to Suzhou and through the vision of its citizens, businessmen, and politicians, raised the money, brought artisans from Suzhou, and turned a former block long parking lot in the middle of the city into Lan Su Yuan.

It’s simply superb.

In fact, for me it had the one element that was missing from my visits to the gardens in China, the ability to get a feel of what these gardens are truly like. Because of their popularity in Suzhou, the gardens there are filled with visitors, and I always found myself wishing everyone would leave so I could experience them as they were meant to be.

While the replica in Portland was not devoid of visitors, it was possible to get a sense of the peace and harmony and splendor of a classical Chinese garden.

A few pictures below from my iPhone can serve as an introduction (Ellen was not with me so I didn’t have the benefit of her wonderful photography, tho I do plan to return there, with her and her photographic skills.)

If you’re ever in or near Portland, consider spending a morning or afternoon at Lan Su Yuan. You’re in for a treat.

photo.16

photo11

photo.19

photo.21

photo.12

photo.13

To see more of Lan Su Yuan, check out this 2:34 minute YouTube video.

To read more about Lan Su Yuan and visiting it, check out their website.

Red Sox: Wrong, Dumb, & Foolish

Tags

, , ,

A-Rod Answers Dempster

I don’t usually post about the most immediate events, whether sports or other, but Sox fans need to make their voices heard on this one.

When I learned last night that Dempster had hit A-Rod, I couldn’t believe it. I turned off the game and said to myself, “The Sox deserve to lose this one.”

I was on an early morning flight today to San Francisco (and later in the week will head to Portland and then to LA) to visit with friends and see two Sox games vs the Giants and two vs Dem Bums. So I don’t know what is being said about Dempster hitting A-Rod (except for the email I got stating disapproval from my long-suffering Sox cousin). But I can say I’m not as excited to see them tonight as I thought I would be.

Hitting A-Rod was simply wrong, despite his disrespect for the rules of the game.

Yes. He’s a cheater and a liar, amongst other things. But the best Sox players could do would be to speak out against him, not to hit him.

Because A-Rod is wrong doesn’t give the Sox the right to hit him. A-Rod’s peers should call him out publicly. That’s the best and most powerful way to respond to his behaviors and to send a message to other PED users.

Additionally, it’s dumb and foolish. You’re in a tight race, ahead in this game 2-0, and why do anything that takes the focus off winning and gives the Yunkees and A-Rod fuel?

Simply wrong, dumb, and foolish.

Sox got what they deserved.

Three Films To See: The Act of Killing, The Spectacular Now, & Lee Daniels’ The Butler

Tags

, , , , , , ,

The Act of Killing *****

104668_gal

This film is probably the most unusual documentary I have ever seen.

Just trying to describe the ‘story’ is a challenge and so I quote from IMBd’s Synopsis:

When the government of Indonesia was overthrown by the military in 1965, Anwar {Congo} and his friends were promoted from small-time gangsters who sold movie theatre tickets on the black market to death squad leaders. They helped the army kill more than one million alleged communists, ethnic Chinese, and intellectuals in less than a year. As the executioner for the most notorious death squad in his city, Anwar himself killed hundreds of people with his own hands. Today, Anwar is revered as a founding father of a right-wing paramilitary organization that grew out of the death squads. The organization is so powerful that its leaders include government ministers, and they are happy to boast about everything from corruption and election rigging to acts of genocide.

THE ACT OF KILLING is about killers who have won, and the sort of society they have built. Unlike ageing Nazis or Rwandan genocidaires, Anwar and his friends have not been forced by history to admit they participated in crimes against humanity. Instead, they have written their own triumphant history, becoming role models for millions of young paramilitaries. THE ACT OF KILLING is a journey into the memories and imaginations of the perpetrators, offering insight into the minds of mass killers. And THE ACT OF KILLING is a nightmarish vision of a frighteningly banal culture of impunity in which killers can joke about crimes against humanity on television chat shows, and celebrate moral disaster with the ease and grace of a soft shoe dance number.

And film director Joshua Oppenheimer writes about his intentions in making the documentary:

The Act of Killing reveals why violence we hope would be unimaginable is not only imagined, but also routinely performed. It is an effort to understand the moral vacuum that makes it possible for perpetrators of genocide to be celebrated on public television with cheers and smiles. It is a call to reexamine easy reassurances that we are the good guys fighting the bad guys, just because we say so.

“Some viewers may desire resolution by the end of the film, a successful struggle for justice that results in changes in the balance of power, human rights tribunals, reparations, and official apologies. The film alone cannot create these changes, but this desire has been our inspiration as well, as we seek to shed light on the darkest chapters of both the local and global human story, and to express the real costs of blindness, expedience, and an inability to control greed and the hunger for power in an increasingly unified world society. This is not a story about Indonesia. This is a story about us all.”

The Act of Killing was in DC briefly and then reappeared this weekend at the West End Cinema. If it shows up wherever you live, or becomes available in other formats, consider going out of your way to see it.

You will not be entertained, and I doubt if you’ve ever seen anything similar.

I suspect you will be stunned and long remember it.

I was, and I will.

 

The Spectacular Now ****

101871_gal

This one is entertaining, and its story is one you have seen, read, know, or perhaps have observed or have experienced yourself.

Two high school seniors, quite different on the surface, find themselves surprisingly involved with each other. I won’t spoil the film for you by telling you much more than that.

What I can say is that both leads, Shailene Woodley and Miles Teller are two of the reasons the film is better than many ‘coming of age’ stories. With the direction of James Ponsoldt, The Spectacular Now draws you in with its humor, its honesty, and its tenderness. It is (mostly) believable and avoids many of the pitfalls of a story we all know. Although it is slowly paced (too much so at times?), both the story and the actors grow on you, and you almost don’t want the film to end.

 

Lee Daniels’ The Butler ****

o-THE-BUTLER-POSTER-570

A dilemma.

Tho a bit too long, both in the length of the film and in the time period it covers (1926-2008), I found The Butler involving and engaging.

The wonderful performances of Forest Whitaker and Oprah Winfrey (and in a lesser role Cuba Gooding Jr.) make this journey through the civil rights struggles of 60s, etc. worth your watching, whether you were there then or are new to much of it. Daniels’ vehicle of portraying this time period through the life of one family is well done.

Spoilers:

My problem with the film is that many of the key parts of the movie are not true, more so than is often the case with a film “based on a true story.”  So if you are looking to know about the life of the man who served in the White House under eight presidents over three decades, the film fails (at least for me). From the opening scenes in which a young boy sees his mother raped and father killed to adding a second son to his family (he and his wife only had one son, not two) to the truth about his wife, and to the end where he supposedly has a personal audience with President Obama, Daniels sacrifices truth for drama.

With my ‘need’ to have things be (more?) honest, that spoils the film for me. I suspect a film based more truthfully on the life of ‘The Butler’ would never make it to the screen and be considered for various Oscars.

But Daniels chose to make a drama and not a documentary. Given that as his goal, then it is possible to enjoy the film.

(With thanx to AR, you can check out where Daniels departs from the truth with this article, ‘The Butler Fact Check: How True Is This ‘True Story.’)

*                         *                          *                           *

There are a number of films we/I saw in our film club and over six months which are now out in the theaters. Each of the films below deserve your attention. You can get to my mini-reviews by clicking on the title of the film:

  • Black Fish (Unrated, reviewed by guest blogger Elizabeth Miller)

For an expanded list that includes another half dozen or so good films, see an earlier post, Best in 2013 (as of July 3, 2013).

MLB’s New Challenge System: The Right Call?

Tags

, , ,

canstockphoto9695161(2)

As far as I understand, here are the key elements of a new review system that have been announced by MLB:

  • It is a ‘challenge system’ and not one initiated by an umpire (or a replay umpire).
  • Each manager will have three challenges in a game, one in the first six innings and two in the remainder of the game (no carry over from the first six innings into the latter part of the game).
  • If the challenge is successful (and the call overturned), then the manager gets back that call, potentially allowing many more than three challenges during a game.
  • The reviews will be done by humans at the MLB Advanced Media facility in NYC.
  • Balls and strikes cannot be appealed but most other plays can (89% of the umpires’ calls are to be reviewable, tho the specifics have not been announced yet).
  • Non-reviewable plays can still be argued by a manager who can request the four umpires meet to discuss a call.
  • The new system, if approved by the owners, the players, and the umpires, will be instituted for the 2014 season and will be reviewed for adjustments prior to the 2015 season.

There is also a report that the umpires will ask for what is being called a ‘doomsday trigger’ – the ability to request a replay themselves if a manager is out of challenges.

To read (and see) for yourself more specifically what MLB’s commissioner Bud Selig actually announced, see this link, MLB to Expand Instant Reply.

Apparently, MLB had to decide whether to go with a ‘challenge system’ or a system which would let the umpire or a replay umpire decide what would be reviewed. In deciding on the ‘challenge system,’ they chose a variation of what is already in use in other sports, particularly NFL football.

130815_SNUT_BaseballReplayChallengeUmpire.jpg.CROP.article250-mediumMLB believes that this new system will compensate for umpire error and will take only 1 1/2 minutes per challenge, less than the three minutes that it now takes when the umpires go off of the field to review a play themselves. Additionally, MLB seems to believe that there will be a reduction in time spent with managers arguing calls as the replays will be triggered immediately when a team asks for one.

One of the criticisms of this system is that it is only a ‘half step’ and that MLB should have gone with an umpire directed replay scenario if the intent is to get all of the calls right and not be dependent upon a manager asking for or being out of challenges.

The best article I’ve seen that argues that the ‘challenge system’ is only a partial response to getting calls right is Joe Posnasnki’s MLB Blows Call with Challenge System.

So, what do you think?

Is this system a good one?

Is baseball going to be better off because of it?

Will the ‘human element’ be taken out of baseball and so change what we’ve had up until now?

Will games be lengthened, shortened?

Is it the right replay system?

Please add your Comment below.

 

Impeding the Right to Vote

Tags

, , , ,

4440-400x2611

There are a number of national issues that I find disturbing, but most of them I keep to myself, and I don’t use MillersTime to rail against them.

Global warming, and the unwillingness to face it, is one. Money in politics, and what that is doing to our democratic system, is another. Then there’s Congress’s inability to function when we have issues that need to be addressed.  I could add the hatred and dishonesty spewed on talk radio, some of the cable TV outlets, and in other public places.  I could go on but will spare you.

But there is one issue that for some reason rises to the top of my list and provokes me to action. It is the reason I went to Ohio this past year for a week to canvas in the 2012 elections and to help get out the vote.

The more I followed various states’ actions at limiting voter’s ability to go to the polls last year, the angrier I got. I followed this issue closely, and it seemed to me that rather than protecting the integrity of our voting system, these actions were meant to discourage or to inhibit voters from going to the polls.  (In Pennsylvania, officials admitted to/bragged about using voting rights restrictions to make it easier for Mitt Romney to win in their state.)

For me, the cornerstone of our democratic system starts with the freedom to vote. When that is inhibited, whether by instituting a poll tax, disallowing certain classes to vote, or putting barriers in the way of voters, I think we head down a dangerous path.

Yesterday, the governor of North Carolina, Pat McCrory, quietly signed into law a voting ‘rights’ bill which, among other things, did the following:

  • Require voter photo ID at polling places.
  • Reduce the early voting period from 17 days to 10 days.
  • Prohibit counties from extending poll hours by one hour on Election Day even in extraordinary circumstances, such as in response to long lines. (Those in line at closing time would still be allowed to vote.)
  • Eliminate pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-olds, who currently can register to vote before they turn 18.
  • Outlaw paid voter registration drives.
  • Eliminate straight-ticket voting.
  • Eliminate provisional voting if someone shows up at the wrong precinct.
  • Allow any registered voter of a county to challenge the eligibility of a voter rather than just a voter of the precinct in which the suspect voter is registered.

North Carolina’s new voting bill is just one of the many new laws that are working their way through state legislatures following the recent Supreme Court decision that declared Section 5 of the 1965/2006 Voting Rights Act unnecessary (unconsititutional?), saying there was little evidence of continuing racial discrimination in the states that were required to get preclearance before changing their voting laws.

If you think the Citizens United decision about money in the campaign system opened a floodgate, watch what is about to happen now as states begin to institute new voting rights restrictions under the guise of “protecting the integrity of our voting system.”

Pardon Me If I Don’t Cheer

Tags

, , , ,

News articles (here and here) in the last week or so have claimed that Henrietta Lacks’ family has finally gained something from the use of her cells.

It isn’t enough.6493208

I know some MillersTime readers are familiar with the story of Henrietta Lacks because many of you cited Rebecca Skloot’s wonderful book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks* as one of your favorite reads a couple of years ago.

From NBC News: “Over the past six decades, huge medical advances have sprung from the cells of Henrietta Lacks, a poor, African-American mother of five who died in 1951 of cervical cancer. But Lacks never agreed that the cells from a biopsy before her death taken could be used for research. For years, her own family had no idea that her cells were still alive in petri dishes in scientists’ labs. They eventually learned they had fueled a line called HeLa cells, which have generated billions of dollars, but they didn’t realize until this spring that her genome had been sequenced and made public for anyone to see.”

A week ago, NIH announced it had reached agreement with the Lacks family, according to NBC: “Under a new agreement, Lack’s genome data will be accessible only to those who apply for and are granted permission. And two representatives of the Lacks family will serve on the NIH group responsible for reviewing biomedical researchers’ applications for controlled access to HeLa cells. Additionally, any researcher who uses that data will be asked to include an acknowledgement to the Lacks family in their publications.”

OK.  A first step? Some scientific recognition?

But many careers, scientific advancements and untold numbers of dollars have been made because of the use of the cells taken from Henrietta Lacks’ cervix. Neither she nor her family knew about this for years nor has anyone in the Lacks’ family received financial recompense.

Pardon me, but I don’t think nor agree, as the NBC article and others are saying, that “that failure has now been fixed.”

(*Rebecca Skloots, at least, has tried to make amends. With some of the profits from her book, she established the Henrietta Lacks Foundation, which, according to their website, “strives to provide financial assistance to needy individuals who have made important contributions to scientific research without personally benefiting from those contributions, particularly those used in research without their knowledge or consent. The Foundation gives those who have benefited from those contributions — including scientists, universities, corporations, and the general public — a way to show their appreciation to such research subjects and their families {my emphasis}”)

 

A Few Pix of the 3rd Grandchild

Tags

You can blame/thank our friend FH for this post.

photo(73)She correctly wanted to know why I had not posted any pictures (other than those when he was born) of Ryan Samuel Orgad, the third grandchild.

Ellen has continued to take endless pictures every time we’re together, but I guess I have been a bit remiss in not posting them. So that’s my excuse for these pictures, taken when Ryan was one and two months old (the good ones are by Ellen, of course).

photo(74)

 

photo(75)

Ryan.1

Ryan.2

RAM_Ryan    Eli_Ryan

If You Have Texted Even Once While Driving…

Tags

, ,

…consider spending the 34 minutes and 56 seconds it will take to watch this video, From One Second to the Next.

It was made and directed by Werner Herzog, the accomplished German filmmaker, at the request of AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile.

From One Second to the Next will be shown to school groups and government agencies across the country.

But it seems to me that it is also worth all of us seeing this ‘scared straight’ documentary, whether we are an invincible youth, the 24/7 texting millennial generation, or the older and more experienced driver who also thinks that every text message needs to be read and answered upon receiving it or that we must call home to say we’ll be there in five minutes.

A few statistics:

  • In 2011, 23% of all auto collisions involved cell phones. That equals 1.3 million crashes.
  • Five seconds is the minimal time your attention is taken away when you’re texting. That means if you’re driving 55 mph, you go the length of a football field without looking at the road.
  • Text messaging makes a crash up to 23 times more likely. Dialing increases your chances of crashing 2.8 times. Reaching for your cell phone 1.4 times, and talking or listening 1.3 times.
  • 48% of young drivers have seen their parents talking on a cell while driving and 15% have seen them texting. It is not just a young person’s activity or problem.

(For more statistics and what the current laws are regarding this issue, see this link.)

I now put my cell phone away when I get in my car to drive. So far, I’ve done this for four days and hope to do so permanently. But I may have to see From One Second to the Next again every so often.